<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deconstructing Flickr&#8217;s &#8220;Interestingness!&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wes2.wordpress.com/2006/05/12/deconstructing-flickrs-interestingness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wes2.wordpress.com/2006/05/12/deconstructing-flickrs-interestingness/</link>
	<description>...because Wes 1.0 was so much darn fun</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Social Design Patterns for Reputation Systems: An Interview with Yahoo’s Bryce Glass (Part II) - Bokardo</title>
		<link>http://wes2.wordpress.com/2006/05/12/deconstructing-flickrs-interestingness/#comment-6049</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Design Patterns for Reputation Systems: An Interview with Yahoo’s Bryce Glass (Part II) - Bokardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wes2.wordpress.com/2006/05/12/deconstructing-flickrs-interestingness/#comment-6049</guid>
		<description>[...] who&#8217;re left out. There&#8217;s a reason why Flickr has only ever applied the descriptor of interestingness to photos, and not the people that take them—and that reason is that the community folks over [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] who&#8217;re left out. There&#8217;s a reason why Flickr has only ever applied the descriptor of interestingness to photos, and not the people that take them—and that reason is that the community folks over [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Analyzing your relationships &#171; colaboratorie mutopo</title>
		<link>http://wes2.wordpress.com/2006/05/12/deconstructing-flickrs-interestingness/#comment-6043</link>
		<dc:creator>Analyzing your relationships &#171; colaboratorie mutopo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 01:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wes2.wordpress.com/2006/05/12/deconstructing-flickrs-interestingness/#comment-6043</guid>
		<description>[...] Flickr doesnt go into much detail about how this works, but there are plenty of speculators who build on their hints. The end result is that without knowing anything about the photos, Flickr is able to identify the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Flickr doesnt go into much detail about how this works, but there are plenty of speculators who build on their hints. The end result is that without knowing anything about the photos, Flickr is able to identify the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Photos &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Making the top ten of Interestingness</title>
		<link>http://wes2.wordpress.com/2006/05/12/deconstructing-flickrs-interestingness/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>In Photos &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Making the top ten of Interestingness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wes2.wordpress.com/2006/05/12/deconstructing-flickrs-interestingness/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>[...] Deconstructing Flickr’s &#8220;Interestingness!&#8221; (via) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Deconstructing Flickr’s &#8220;Interestingness!&#8221; (via) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
